Saturday, March 13, 2010

The Democratic Party, the Evangelical Left and Abortion

Robert Costa in The Corner has a report on an interview with Bart Stupak, the leader of the pro-life group of Democratic House of Representatives members. It makes for jaw-dropping reading on the ferocity of the pro-abortion fervor among the current leaders of the Democratic Party. [my bolding]

"Sitting in an airport, on his way home to Michigan, Rep. Bart Stupak, a pro-life Democrat, is chagrined. “They’re ignoring me,” he says, in a phone interview with National Review Online. “That’s their strategy now. The House Democratic leaders think they have the votes to pass the Senate’s health-care bill without us. At this point, there is no doubt that they’ve been able to peel off one or two of my twelve. And even if they don’t have the votes, it’s been made clear to us that they won’t insert our language on the abortion issue.”

According to Stupak, that group of twelve pro-life House Democrats — the “Stupak dozen” — has privately agreed for months to vote ‘no’ on the Senate’s health-care bill if federal funding for abortion is included in the final legislative language. Now, in the debate’s final hours, Stupak says the other eleven are coming under “enormous” political pressure from both the White House and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.). “I am a definite ‘no’ vote,” he says. “I didn’t cave. The others are having both of their arms twisted, and we’re all getting pounded by our traditional Democratic supporters, like unions.”

Stupak says he also doesn’t trust the “Slaughter solution,” a legislative maneuver being bandied about on Capitol Hill as a way to pass the Senate bill in the House without actually voting on it. “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me,” he says. “I don’t have a warm-and-fuzzy feeling about what I’m hearing.”

Stupak notes that his negotiations with House Democratic leaders in recent days have been revealing. “I really believe that the Democratic leadership is simply unwilling to change its stance,” he says. “Their position says that women, especially those without means available, should have their abortions covered.” The arguments they have made to him in recent deliberations, he adds, “are a pretty sad commentary on the state of the Democratic party.”

What are Democratic leaders saying? “If you pass the Stupak amendment, more children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more. That’s one of the arguments I’ve been hearing,” Stupak says. “Money is their hang-up. Is this how we now value life in America? If money is the issue — come on, we can find room in the budget. This is life we’re talking about.”

If Obamacare passes, Stupak says, it could signal the end of any meaningful role for pro-life Democrats within their own party. “It would be very, very hard for someone who is a right-to-life Democrat to run for office,” he says. “I won’t leave the party. I’m more comfortable here and still believe in a role within it for the right-to-life cause, but this bill will make being a pro-life Democrat much more difficult. They don’t even want to debate this issue. We’ll probably have to wait until the Republicans take back the majority to fix this.”

“Throughout this debate, even when the House leaders have acknowledged us, it’s always been in a backhanded way,” he laments. “I’m telling the others to hold firm, and we’ll meet next week, but I’m disappointed in my colleagues who said they’d be with us and now they’re not. It’s almost like some right-to-life members don’t want to be bothered. They just want this over.”

And the politics of the issue are pretty rough. “This has really reached an unhealthy stage,” Stupak says. “People are threatening ethics complaints on me. On the left, they’re really stepping it up. Every day, from Rachel Maddow to the Daily Kos, it keeps coming. Does it bother me? Sure. Does it change my position? No.”"

Could the Democratic leadership actually be so crass as to view abortion funding as a way to save money? Could they actually be that insensitive to human life? And they try to paint the Republicans as unfeeling and lacking in compassion? How a Christian could vote for people like that is beyond me.

Now maybe I missed it, but I have not heard a word from Sojourners or Brian McLaren or Tony Campolo expressing support for the brave little band of Democratic House of Representatives members who are standing up the Democratic establishment on a matter of life and death. I went to the Sojourners website and they highlighted support for the health care bill but never mentioned abortion. Remember that the next time they portray themselves as bring Evangelical concerns to bear on the Democratic Party. The Conference of Catholic Bishops, the Family Research Council, the National Right to Life Association and the Susan B. Anthony List, among others, have been faithful in fighting the good fight. Left-wing Evangelicals have been MIA.

During the run-up to the 2008 election, which Tony Campolo served on the Platform Committee and they touted the new "abortion reduction" language, I told you it was all smoke and mirrors. How I wish now that I had been wrong.

The moral of the story is: "Don't trust the Democratic Party establishment on abortion and don't trust left wing Evangelicals to take a conservative position on anything."

No comments: