Trudeau, Obama and Ignatieff

I have two further thoughts on the previous post on Pierre Elliot Trudeau.

First, having had a quick peek at the Liberal Party platform and having listened to Michael Ignatieff, I would say that if he is elected Prime Minister we will have the second coming of Trudeau. Ignatieff is a welfare state, high tax, big government liberal who would love to undo the progress made in Canada over the past 20 years toward fiscal sanity.

Never in recent memory has an election presented such a sharp contrast in ideology. The Conservatives are basically a moderate, slightly right-of-center party, while the current version of the Liberal Party is slightly to the right of the NDP - very slightly. If the Conservatives do not attain a majority this time, there will likely be a coalition of liberals, socialists and separatists and then the progress of the past two decades will be rolled back and the Sixties will break out all over again. Shudder!

Second, my American readers might want to do some comparisons of Frum's description of Trudeau and Obama. They parallels are almost eerie until you realize that both are products of the same 60s, New Left, postmodern, politically correct intellectual milieu. The question is whether Obama will do as much damage to America as Trudeau did to Canada. One prays that he will not.

Pierre Elliot Trudeau: Canada's Worst Prime Minister

David Frum has a tremendous article in today's National Post on the horrible legacy of Pierre Elliot Trudeau, which makes the case that Trudeau was the most destructive prime minister in Canadian history. It is an illuminating piece that shows how Trudeau in many ways embodied the New Left sensibilities of the 60s and led Canada into a brave new world of debt, statism and a break with tradition and culture. He writes:

Canada today is a very successful country. It has suffered less from the global economic crisis than any other major economy.

So Canadians may be tempted to be philosophical about disasters in their own past. Hasn’t all come out right in the end? Of course you could say the same about the invasions of Ghengis Khan.

I don’t draw any personal comparison between Pierre Trudeau and Ghengis Khan, obviously. But I want to stress: Canada’s achievement overcoming Trudeau’s disastrous legacy should not inure Canadians to how disastrous that legacy was.

Three subsequent important prime ministers – Brian Mulroney, Jean Chretien and Stephen Harper – invested their energies cleaning up the wreckage left by Pierre Trudeau. The work has taken almost 30 years. Finally and at long last, nobody speculates any more about Canada defaulting on its debt, or splitting apart, or being isolated from all its major allies.

Yet through most of the adult lives of most people in this room, people in Canada and outside Canada did worry about those things.

And as you enjoy the peace, stability and comparative prosperity of Canada in the 2010s just consider – this is how Canadians felt in the middle 1960s. Now imagine a political leader coming along and out of ignorance and arrogance despoiling all this success. Not because the leader faced some overwhelming crisis where it was hard to see the right answer. But utterly unnecessarily. Out of a clear blue sky. Like a malicious child on the beach stomping on the sand castle somebody else had worked all morning to build.

That was the political record of Pierre Trudeau.

I want to examine the Trudeau record in 3 dimensions: What Trudeau did to the Canadian economy, what Trudeau did to Canada’s standing in the world, and what Trudeau did to Canadian political stability.

I’ll conclude by offering some thoughts about the personal and intellectual traits that animated Trudeau’s destructive career. And I hope you’ll agree with me at the end that Trudeau deserves at least this much credit: There was nothing small-scale or parochial about him. As a political wrecker, he was truly world class.

I hope you take the time to read the whole thing here. It is one of the most substantial pieces of writing I have seen in a daily newspaper in quite some time.

Frum could have, but didn't mention that it was Trudeau who led the process by which abortion on demand was legalized and homosexuality was normalized. Trudeau was a flower child fascist who was willing to trash tradition in order to implement his statist dreams. Canada is a much different and worse-off place because of him.