If it were not for this context, the appeal to religious liberty for Muslims would make more sense. But if the goal of Islam is to abolish religious freedom, why should they be allowed to fight to conquer us under the cloak of religious freedom? Put bluntly, they don't deserve religious freedom until they are willing to extend it to apostates, women, minorities in Muslim countries etc.
Tapson's Top Ten are:
1) Obama Sends an Envoy to the OIC
2) The Obama Administration Abolishes Any Discussion of Islam and Terrorism3) Comedy Central Ridicules Every Religious Figure Except Muhammed
4) Publishing Houses Censor Themselves
5) Geert Wilders Goes on Trial for Speaking the Truth
6) The Danish Cartoon Riots
7) Hollywood Complicity8) Bush Avoids Language Offensive to Our Enemy
9) The Invention of “Islamophobia”
10) Ayatollah Khomeini’s Death Fatwa Against Salman RushdieIn the light of these capitulations to Islamic Supremacist by the Ruling Class, it is not surprising that the people are restless and upset. If it were not for Yale University Press bowing to Muslim threats of violence and not publishing the Danish cartoons in a book about the Danish cartoons or Hollywood changing the identity of the terrorists in the movie made of Tom Clancy's The Sum of All Fears from Islamic terrorists to Neo-Nazi terrorists, then people might be more willing to believe that the proposed mosque is really about tolerance and co-existence. The Ground Zero Mosque controversy is much more complicated than just a simple case of religious freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment