tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5328993133397649838.post1228913559169592377..comments2023-10-25T09:45:40.318-04:00Comments on The Politics of the Cross Resurrected: The Democratic Pary Approaches the Point of No ReturnCraig Carterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10209954891388905090noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5328993133397649838.post-65025446777875964442010-03-15T06:54:21.127-04:002010-03-15T06:54:21.127-04:00Hi Craig:
It is doubtful that a Hillary candidacy...Hi Craig:<br /><br />It is doubtful that a Hillary candidacy would represent a move to the political centre. She is also a well-disguised radical, having written her own senior thesis on Saul Alinsky.<br /><br />There has been for many years now a disconnect between the most prominent Democrats who control the party and the mainstream of America. That disconnect is also with the majority of mainstream media outlets (in TV the exception is Fox News), and university faculties. That is why your suggestion that the present government could kill the Democrat Party is not far-fetched. These people, just like Obama, most often only pretend to be moderates; so that their worst nightmare will be to realize their dreams, because it is at that point that they can no longer hide what it is they wanted all along.<br /><br />I often thought that maybe one day, hope against hope, that the Democrat party would die, the blue dogs would join the Republicans and a third, true conservative party would rise up and compete with the left of centre Republican part. Apparently something like that is happening in Alberta today.Peter W. Dunnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07160703257731149376noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5328993133397649838.post-33903998378409666292010-03-14T19:13:43.932-04:002010-03-14T19:13:43.932-04:00True, that was probably an exaggeration. But the ...True, that was probably an exaggeration. But the issue I want to point to is that the take-over of the Party by the McGovern supporting New Left in the early 70's has worked so far because the party has remained a big tent, despite the defection of the "Reagan Democrats" and the neo-conservatives. But what happens if the so-called "Blue Dog Democrats" conclude that they have no future in the party? The Conference of Catholic Bishops are gradually turning against the Democratic Party as their influence shrinks. Bart Stupak recently expressed pessimism about the future of a pro-life movement in the party. <br /><br />What would prevent disaster would be a turn back to the center, such as a primary challenge to Obama from Hilary Clinton. But the question is what would happen to the hard left in such a situation. Likely they would just hold their noses and still vote Democratic. But what if they split off? <br /><br />All things considered, the most likely thing (and the healthiest for US democracy) would be for the Democratic Party to shift to the center and remain a party capable of persuading enough independents to vote for it so that it remains a threat in each election. But many people thought Obama would lead this shift and it is looking ever less likely that he will.Craig Carterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10209954891388905090noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5328993133397649838.post-36478340768308288672010-03-14T18:54:55.627-04:002010-03-14T18:54:55.627-04:00"Finally, the passing of health care could sp..."Finally, the passing of health care could spell the end of the Democratic Party as a major party."<br /><br />It was less than two years ago that liberal bloggers were bragging that the GOP was now only a regional party (i.e. of the South). It's actually a pretty popular thing to predict the demise of one party or another. However even the Republicans came back from the dead after losing five straight presidential elections.Nathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01137883280347838400noreply@blogger.com